Knowledge Musings

Musings about knowledge management as I go about my daily life

Friday, March 7, 2008

Whatever happened to ...?

I was asked last week by Jerry Ash, editor of InsideKnowledge, to contribute an article on IT as an enabler of KM. He drew my attention to an article of mine written in 1998, saying "it just needs a little updating". The article in question is 'Knowledge Management: The Role of Technology'. Although most of the concepts are the same, and technology has improved somewhat (but not spectacularly), two main types of change caught my attention:
  • Change of language - old-fashioned terms we don't use anymore
  • Disappearance of some favourite products - for several reasons.
Anyway, curious to know what happened here's the results of what I found:

Whatever happened to the term ...?
  • Groupware - we tend now to use the term "collaboration software", though the term lives on in a number of open source products;
  • P2P (peer-to-peer) - it didn't catch on in the mainstream and these days one tends to refer to the software's function e.g. streaming, file sharing, and if used it is usually spelt out in full
  • KM suites - all the rage as document management and other companies tried to relabel their products and jump onto the KM bandwagon; however, most vendors (Eloquent is one exception) dropped the term and the more generic term of EDRMS (Electronic Data and Records Management System) is now more common;
  • Computer conferencing - once meant a variety of synchronous or asynchronous methods of messaging over the internet (other than email), such as bulletin boards; today the term conferencing is most commonly used for videoconferencing or webconferencing (even here webinar is more common); perhaps the most common term today is 'online forum' which are web browser based anyway;
Whatever happened to product...?
  • Lotus Notes - once ubiquitious in KM circles, Lotus was taken over by IBM and whereas Notes once referred to either server or client, the server is now called Domino. Notes (or at least Domino) is apparently very much alive, now on version 8, and IBM claims more people using it than ever before. One 2005 article described it as "a program used by 120 million people, of whom about 119m hate it." Perhaps that's why I don't hear about it much these days in the KM community?!
  • COPE - a fascinating concept mapping software developed by Colin Eden. It has been visually improved and is now sold as Banxia Decision Explorer alongside other specialised products.
  • Themescape (Cartia) - this excellent visualisation software for knowledge mapping was bought by Aurigin and became part of its patent analysis software. Aurigin went bankrupt in 2002 and its patent software assets acquired by Micropatent (part of IHI) who incorporated it into it's Aureka software. In turn IHI was taken over by Thomson Scientific and Themescape carries on as a patent mapping tool within Aureka.
  • Groove - a great peer-to-peer collaboration tool developed by Ray Ozzie, creator of Lotus Notes (so a good pedigree). Groove Networks was bought my Microsoft in 2005 and the product marketed (in quite a low key way) as Microsoft Groove. With Groove 2007 now being part of the Microsoft Office 2007 suite (enterprise edition) we may hear more of it again.
  • Semio (including Semio Map and Semio Tagger) - a fascinating set of software for taxonomy visualization and semantic indexing, Semio was acquired in 2002 by Webversa who then changed their name to Entrieva. Entrieva's main thrust is now its internet advertising targetting service ClickSense, in which Semio's technology (now fairly invisible) helps with the contextual targetting.
What this article illustrates is that many good KM software solutions often start as niche. There then seems to be three directions of evolution:

  • They remain niche, though are often grouped with related products for marketing purposes
  • They become mainstream (e.g. Groove, Lotus) but never quite have the leadership they showed when they were new innovations.
  • The technology is subsumed into vertical applications, a segment of the market which continues to grow.
I'd be interested to hear what happened to your favourite software and terminology.



  • At March 7, 2008 8:30 PM , Blogger Christopher W. Weiss said...

    That's right David, "Entrieva's main thrust is now its internet advertising," well said. We're still here and you said it best, we're now applying ClickSense technology to solve the relevancy problem in online advertising. We've come a long way from the Enterprise days but so has our technology. And I bet you'll see even more great things from us soon. Thanks for the mention and keep up the great blog.

    Chris Weiss
    Marketing Director
    Entrieva, Inc.

  • At March 19, 2008 10:30 AM , Blogger David said...

    Whatever happened to Entrieva?

    On 18th March 2008 it renamed the company to LucidMedia. That's change for you!!



Post a Comment

<< Home